Summary
**Case Review: Akshat Bansal vs DLF Gayatri Developers by the Delhi State Commission**
The article examines a case involving a complainant, Akshat Bansal, and DLF Gayatri Developers, centering on the delay in possession of a plot in a housing project. After discovering no development on-site, Bansal filed a complaint, leading to a judicial review by the Delhi State Commission.
- The site was part of Garden City in Andhra Pradesh, but issues arose due to non-development and financial threats.
- Though the developer argued jurisdiction limits for the Delhi Commission, the registered office location justified its involvement.
- The Commission found the delayed possession as a deficiency in service, citing a Supreme Court precedent.
- The developer was ordered to refund Rs. 15,19,467 with interest, alongside additional legal and mental distress compensations.