Article Details

Cadila v. Roche —Mere Apprehension Of Litigation Not A Sufficient Cause Of Action For Suit

Retrieved on: 2025-06-22 14:43:10

Tags for this article:

Click the tags to see associated articles and topics

Cadila v. Roche —Mere Apprehension Of Litigation Not A Sufficient Cause Of Action For Suit. View article details on hiswai:

Excerpt

The plaintiff's case was based entirely on a "mere apprehension" derived from Roche's conduct with third parties. “A plaint must disclose a clear, ...

Article found on: www.livelaw.in

View Original Article

This article is found inside other hiswai user's workspaces. To start your own collection, sign up for free.

Sign Up
Book a Demo